<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Craig Burton - Latest Comments in Open Letter to Steve Ballmer</title><link>http://craigburton.disqus.com/</link><description>Logs, Links, Life and Lexicon</description><atom:link href="https://craigburton.disqus.com/open_letter_to_steve_ballmer/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:10:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Open Letter to Steve Ballmer</title><link>http://www.craigburton.com/?p=3001#comment-21045975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hm, you make an interesting and very valid point. I had no idea that Steve Ballmer was still personally micromanaging the Tuesday updates, and it's clearly a little bit of a problem. At least it seems to be clear from the outside, apparently not that clear to him. Though I can kind of see why he feels the need to do it. After all, these updates go out to everyone - millions and millions of Windows machines. One little blunder can be hugely embarrassing. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rail gear systems</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:10:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Letter to Steve Ballmer</title><link>http://www.craigburton.com/?p=3001#comment-17931643</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It really is sad that one person can stifle the adoption of innovation that will effect so many people. As Oprah would say, "Get with the program Steve!".    : D &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeGrace</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:34:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>